Jurisdictional dualism in France
Division of judicial power in France
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (March 2023) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
- View a machine-translated version of the French article.
- Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
- Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
- You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is
Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Dualité des ordres de juridiction en France]]; see its history for attribution. - You may also add the template
{{Translated|fr|Dualité des ordres de juridiction en France}}to the talk page. - For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.
Jurisdictional dualism in France is the separation of the French court system into two separate divisions, or "ordres", as they are called in French: the ordinary courts (ordre judiciaire), and the administrative courts [fr] (ordre administratif).[1] The ordinary courts, also known as the judiciary order, handle criminal and civil cases, while the administrative courts handle disputes between individuals and the government. This dual system allows for a clear separation of powers and specialized handling of cases related to the actions of the government.The administrative courts are headed by the Council of State, and the ordinary courts by the Court of Cassation for judiciary law.[1]
Introduction
The separation of public law (administrative)[2] and private law (judiciary) goes back to Roman law. A separate branch for public law existed during the Ancien régime. Many other countries have such a system (including in common-law countries) not only in having a separate judicial order for administrative courts (which exist also in Germany, for example, with Article 95 of the Basic Law of Germany). However, France is exceptional in this regard because of the position of the administrative judge in being superior to the administration, and because administrative law is largely unwritten, and established mostly by administrative judicial jurisprudence. That is, administrative law derives largely from case law written by administrative judges, and not by laws passed by the legislature.
In the case of the judiciary order, codes are established by the legislature and open to all,[a] but as administrative law is result of jursprudence and uncodified, it is not discussed in Parliament, not published in the Journal Officiel, and hidden from the public.[3]
When there is a potential conflict of jurisdiction between courts of the administrative order and courts of the judiciary order, this is handled by the Tribunal des conflits.[4]
Judiciary order
Courts of the judiciary order (French: ordre judiciaire), known as "ordinary courts", have jurisdiction for two branches: settling civil cases between private individuals, as well as cases of criminal law.
The branch that deals with disputes between private individuals is the civil courts. Civil courts settle disputes (for example, rent, divorce, inheritance) but do not impose penalties. The criminal courts constitute the branch that handles criminal offenses, and punish offenses against people, property and society.[1][5][6]
Administrative order
The administrative courts (French: ordre administratif) in France are one of the two main branches of the French dual court system, the other being the judiciary order. It handles cases between individuals and the government at any level. Courts of the administrative order have jurisdiction when a "public person" (not a human, but a personne publique) is involved, for example, a municipality or a government department. Courts of the administrative order are organized in three levels: The Council of State, the administrative courts of appeal in the second instance, and the administrative courtsin the first instance; these courts ensure a balance between the prerogatives of public power and the rights of citizens.[1][6]
Specifically excluded from administrative law are civil cases between private individuals, as well as cases of criminal law; these are both handled by the § ordinary courts.
History and evolution
The dual system of law comprises private law (droit privé), also known as judicial law, and public law (droit public).[7][1] This distinction dates back to Roman law.[8]
Roman law
Latin Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Digest, Book I
Roman law was codified, and in the south of France the Jus gentium continued to be used, although mostly only in the case of public and administrative law, and private law was left to the localities to determine.[9] The distinction between private law and public law goes back to Ulpian, a Roman jurist of the third century,[8] who wrote: "Public law is what regards the welfare of the Roman state, private law what regards the interests of individual persons; because some things are of public, others of private utility."[10][b]
Ancien Regime
During the Ancien Regime, the French court system was divided into two branches: the Parlement, which dealt with criminal and civil cases, and the Conseil d'Etat, which dealt with disputes between individuals and the government. This division was based on the idea of separating the judicial and administrative branches of government in order to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure a fair and impartial justice system.
During the Ancien Regime, the Conseil d'Etat played a crucial role in the development of French administrative law. The Conseil d'Etat issued decisions and opinions on legal disputes, which helped to establish a body of administrative law that governed the relationship between individuals and the state. Additionally, the Conseil d'Etat was responsible for advising the king on legal matters, which further solidified its role as the main administrative court.
Montesquieu expressed the distinction between the two, describing public law as, "laws concerning the relationship between those who govern and those who are governed", and private law as "laws concerning the relationship that all citizens have with each other".[8][c]
Changes and reforms
The French legal system has undergone several changes and reforms throughout history. After the French Revolution, the Conseil d'Etat was abolished and replaced with a new court system that was based on separation of powers. In the 19th century, the court system was further reorganized and the Conseil d'Etat was re-established as the main administrative court. In the 20th century, several reforms were implemented to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the court system, including the introduction of new specialized courts and the streamlining of the judicial process.
In recent years, the French government has focused on modernizing the court system, including the introduction of new technologies to improve access to justice and the simplification of the court system to make it more accessible to the general public. These included the Légifrance website, offering open access to a complete database of French legal codes and legal texts, and improvements to the site of the Ministère de la Justice.
2020 court reform
In 2020, there were significant reforms that resulted in the merger of two courts: the administrative court of appeal and the Council of State, creating the new juge des contentieux de la protection (judge of protection disputes) who handles disputes over the protection of individual rights.[11][12]
- The reform aimed to simplify the court system and improve efficiency by reducing the number of courts and streamlining the judicial process.
- The merger of the administrative court of appeal and the Council of State was aimed at reducing the number of courts and streamlining the judicial process.
- The creation of the juge des contentieux de la protection is intended to improve the protection of individual rights.
See also
- Adversarial system
- Code pénal (France)
- Codification (law)
- Cour d'appel (Appellate court)
- Court of Appeal (France)
- Court of Cassation
- Criminal justice system of France
- French criminal law
- Glossary of French criminal law
- Inquisitorial system
- Law of France
- Napoleonic Code
Portals:
France
Law
Politics
References
- Notes
- ^ Open to all: in recent years, legal codes are freely available online in the form of the Légifrance website established by the French government, according to law.[13]
- ^ Ulpian wrote: "huius studii duae sunt positiones: publicum et privatum. Publicum ius est, quod ad statum rei Romanae spectat; privatum, quod ad singulorum utilitatem." in Digest, § 1.2.1.1.[10]
- ^ Montesquieu quotations: public law: "les lois dans le rapport qu'ont ceux qui gouvernent avec ceux qui sont gouvernés", and private law: "les lois dans le rapport que tous les citoyens ont entre eux".[8]
- Citations
- ^ a b c d e MDLJ-OrgJustice 2021.
- ^ Isom 2022.
- ^ Bermann & Picard 2008, p. xxxii.
- ^ Sauvé 2016.
- ^ MDLJ-OJudiciaire 2021.
- ^ a b Beaudoin 2021.
- ^ Bermann & Picard 2008, p. 58.
- ^ a b c d Dadomo & Farran 1996, p. 16.
- ^ Dadomo & Farran 1996, p. 1.
- ^ a b Dadomo & Farran 1996, p. 16, fn.47.
- ^ Legifrance, Judicial Organization code, L213-4-1.
- ^ Legifrance, Le juge des contentieux de la protection (art. L213-4-1 to L213-4-8).
- ^ Legifrance, Decree of 9 October 2002 establishing the Légifrance internet portal.
Works cited
- Beaudoin, Franck (15 October 2021). "French law: quick overview". Retrieved 3 March 2023.
- Bermann, George A.; Picard, Etienne, eds. (1 January 2008). Introduction to French Law. Kluwer Law. ISBN 978-90-411-2466-1. OCLC 219574344.
- Dadomo, Christian; Farran, Susan (1996) [1st pub. 1993]. The French legal system (2nd ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. ISBN 0-421-53970-4.
- Isom, David (16 November 2022), Legal System - French Legal Research Guide - Guides at Georgetown Law Library, Georgetown Law Library, retrieved 1 March 2023 see 'loi'
- République française; Secrétariat général du gouvernement (19 October 2022). "Légifrance Le service public de la diffusion du droit" [The public service for dissemination of the law]. Légifrance. Direction de l'information légale et administrative. ISSN 2270-8987. OCLC 867599055.
- French Ministry of Justice (15 November 2021). "Présentation de l'ordre judiciaire" [Presentation of the judicial order]. Ministère de la Justice (in French). Retrieved 25 February 2023.
L'ordre judiciaire se divise en deux catégories de juridictions : les juridictions civiles et les juridictions pénales. Les juridictions civiles tranchent les litiges.
[The judiciary order is divided into two categories of courts: the civil courts and the criminal courts. The civil courts decide disputes.] - French Ministry of Justice (15 September 2021). "L'organisation de la justice en France" [Organization of justice in France]. Ministère de la Justice (in French).
Les juridictions françaises se répartissent en deux ordres : un ordre judiciaire et un ordre administratif. Les juridictions de l'ordre judiciaire sont compétentes pour régler les litiges opposant les personnes privées et pour sanctionner les auteurs d'infractions aux lois pénales. ... Les juridictions de l'ordre administratif sont compétentes dès qu'une personne publique est en cause (une municipalité ou un service de l'État par exemple).
[The French courts are divided into two orders: a judicial order and an administrative order. The courts of the judicial order are responsible for settling disputes between private individuals and for punishing the perpetrators of criminal offenses. ... The administrative courts have jurisdiction as soon as a public entity is involved (a municipality or a government department for example).]
- Sauvé, Jean-Marc (28 September 2016). "Le dualisme juridictionnel : synergies et complémentarité" [Jurisdictional dualism: synergy and complementarity] (in French). Retrieved 22 January 2023.
Le dualisme juridictionnel, qui a d'ailleurs été expressément inscrit dans notre Constitution par la révision constitutionnelle du 23 juillet 2008 instituant l'article 61-1 relatif à la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité, ne saurait en effet être regardé que comme les deux faces d'une même pièce : deux ordres de juridiction rendant la justice « au nom du peuple français » représenté dans un seul État et dans un ordre juridique unique.
[Jurisdictional dualism, which was moreover expressly enshrined in our Constitution by the constitutional revision of 23 July 2008 instituting article 61-1 relative to the preliminary question of constitutionality, can only be seen as two sides of the same coin: two orders of jurisdiction dispensing justice "in the name of the French people", as represented in a single State and in a single legal order.]
Further reading
- John Bell; Sophie Boyron; Simon Whittaker (27 March 2008). Principles of French Law (2 ed.). OUP Oxford. pp. 129–. ISBN 978-0-19-101889-3. OCLC 865331945.
- Cairns, Walter; McKeon, Robert C.; McKeon, Robert (1995). Introduction to French Law. Cavendish. ISBN 978-1-85941-112-4. OCLC 246842627.
- Elliott, Catherine (2001). French Criminal Law. Portland OR: Willan. ISBN 978-1-135-99307-8. OCLC 49494876.
- Hodgson, Jacqueline (8 November 2005). French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84731-069-9. OCLC 1048749661.
- Bloemberg, Ronnie (25 May 2020). The Development of the Criminal Law of Evidence in the Netherlands, France and Germany between 1750 and 1870: From the system of legal proofs to the free evaluation of the evidence. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-41502-7. OCLC 1121421394.
- Guinchard, Serge; Debard, Thierry (22 June 2016). Lexique des termes juridiques 2016-2017 [Glossary of legal terms 2016-2017]. Lexiques (in French) (24 ed.). Dalloz. ISBN 978-2-247-16502-5. OCLC 952706958. Lay version
- van den Berge, L (23 May 2018). "Rethinking the Public-Private Law Divide in the Age of Governmentality and Network Governance". European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 5 (2): 119–143. doi:10.1163/22134514-00502002. S2CID 158051896.
External links
- Courts and tribunals, French Ministry of Justice (in French)
- v
- t
- e
| Sources of the law |
|
|---|---|
| Codes and documents | |
| People | |
| Institutions |
|
| Judiciary |
|
|---|---|
| Other |
|
| Codes | |
|---|---|
| Classes |
|
| Components [fr] |
|
| Aggravating and mitigating factors |
|
| Examples |
|
procedure
| Guiding principles |
|
|---|---|
| Modes |
|
| Actions |
|
| Roles |
|
| Redress |
|
| Basics |
|
|---|---|
| Penalties |
|
| publishing |
|---|
- Glossary
- Codification [fr]
- Constitution
- Law of France
- Sources [fr]
  | This article relating to the law of France is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e
