Satellite knot

Type of mathematical knot

In the mathematical theory of knots, a satellite knot is a knot that contains an incompressible, non boundary-parallel torus in its complement.[1] Every knot is either hyperbolic, a torus, or a satellite knot. The class of satellite knots include composite knots, cable knots, and Whitehead doubles. A satellite link is one that orbits a companion knot K in the sense that it lies inside a regular neighborhood of the companion.[2]: 217 

A satellite knot K {\displaystyle K} can be picturesquely described as follows: start by taking a nontrivial knot K {\displaystyle K'} lying inside an unknotted solid torus V {\displaystyle V} . Here "nontrivial" means that the knot K {\displaystyle K'} is not allowed to sit inside of a 3-ball in V {\displaystyle V} and K {\displaystyle K'} is not allowed to be isotopic to the central core curve of the solid torus. Then tie up the solid torus into a nontrivial knot.

This means there is a non-trivial embedding f : V S 3 {\displaystyle f\colon V\to S^{3}} and K = f ( K ) {\displaystyle K=f\left(K'\right)} . The central core curve of the solid torus V {\displaystyle V} is sent to a knot H {\displaystyle H} , which is called the "companion knot" and is thought of as the planet around which the "satellite knot" K {\displaystyle K} orbits. The construction ensures that f ( V ) {\displaystyle f(\partial V)} is a non-boundary parallel incompressible torus in the complement of K {\displaystyle K} . Composite knots contain a certain kind of incompressible torus called a swallow-follow torus, which can be visualized as swallowing one summand and following another summand.

Since V {\displaystyle V} is an unknotted solid torus, S 3 V {\displaystyle S^{3}\setminus V} is a tubular neighbourhood of an unknot J {\displaystyle J} . The 2-component link K J {\displaystyle K'\cup J} together with the embedding f {\displaystyle f} is called the pattern associated to the satellite operation.

A convention: people usually demand that the embedding f : V S 3 {\displaystyle f\colon V\to S^{3}} is untwisted in the sense that f {\displaystyle f} must send the standard longitude of V {\displaystyle V} to the standard longitude of f ( V ) {\displaystyle f(V)} . Said another way, given any two disjoint curves c 1 , c 2 V {\displaystyle c_{1},c_{2}\subset V} , f {\displaystyle f} preserves their linking numbers i.e.: lk ( f ( c 1 ) , f ( c 2 ) ) = lk ( c 1 , c 2 ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {lk} (f(c_{1}),f(c_{2}))=\operatorname {lk} (c_{1},c_{2})} .

Basic families

When K V {\displaystyle K'\subset \partial V} is a torus knot, then K {\displaystyle K} is called a cable knot. Examples 3 and 4 are cable knots. The cable constructed with given winding numbers (m,n) from another knot K, is often called the (m,n) cable of K.

If K {\displaystyle K'} is a non-trivial knot in S 3 {\displaystyle S^{3}} and if a compressing disc for V {\displaystyle V} intersects K {\displaystyle K'} in precisely one point, then K {\displaystyle K} is called a connect-sum. Another way to say this is that the pattern K J {\displaystyle K'\cup J} is the connect-sum of a non-trivial knot K {\displaystyle K'} with a Hopf link.

If the link K J {\displaystyle K'\cup J} is the Whitehead link, K {\displaystyle K} is called a Whitehead double. If f {\displaystyle f} is untwisted, K {\displaystyle K} is called an untwisted Whitehead double.

Examples

  • Example 1: A connect-sum of a trefoil and figure-8 knot.
    Example 1: A connect-sum of a trefoil and figure-8 knot.
  • Example 2: The Whitehead double of the figure-8.
    Example 2: The Whitehead double of the figure-8.
  • Example 3: A cable of a connect-sum.
    Example 3: A cable of a connect-sum.
  • Example 4: A cable of a trefoil.
    Example 4: A cable of a trefoil.
  • Example 5: A knot which is a 2-fold satellite i.e.: it has non-parallel swallow-follow tori.
    Example 5: A knot which is a 2-fold satellite i.e.: it has non-parallel swallow-follow tori.
  • Example 6: A knot which is a 2-fold satellite i.e.: it has non-parallel swallow-follow tori.
    Example 6: A knot which is a 2-fold satellite i.e.: it has non-parallel swallow-follow tori.

Examples 5 and 6 are variants on the same construction. They both have two non-parallel, non-boundary-parallel incompressible tori in their complements, splitting the complement into the union of three manifolds. In 5, those manifolds are: the Borromean rings complement, trefoil complement, and figure-8 complement. In 6, the figure-8 complement is replaced by another trefoil complement.

Origins

In 1949 [3] Horst Schubert proved that every oriented knot in S 3 {\displaystyle S^{3}} decomposes as a connect-sum of prime knots in a unique way, up to reordering, making the monoid of oriented isotopy-classes of knots in S 3 {\displaystyle S^{3}} a free commutative monoid on countably-infinite many generators. Shortly after, he realized he could give a new proof of his theorem by a close analysis of the incompressible tori present in the complement of a connect-sum. This led him to study general incompressible tori in knot complements in his epic work Knoten und Vollringe,[4] where he defined satellite and companion knots.

Follow-up work

Schubert's demonstration that incompressible tori play a major role in knot theory was one several early insights leading to the unification of 3-manifold theory and knot theory. It attracted Waldhausen's attention, who later used incompressible surfaces to show that a large class of 3-manifolds are homeomorphic if and only if their fundamental groups are isomorphic.[5] Waldhausen conjectured what is now the Jaco–Shalen–Johannson-decomposition of 3-manifolds, which is a decomposition of 3-manifolds along spheres and incompressible tori. This later became a major ingredient in the development of geometrization, which can be seen as a partial-classification of 3-dimensional manifolds. The ramifications for knot theory were first described in the long-unpublished manuscript of Bonahon and Siebenmann.[6]

Uniqueness of satellite decomposition

In Knoten und Vollringe, Schubert proved that in some cases, there is essentially a unique way to express a knot as a satellite. But there are also many known examples where the decomposition is not unique.[7] With a suitably enhanced notion of satellite operation called splicing, the JSJ decomposition gives a proper uniqueness theorem for satellite knots.[8][9]

See also

  • Hyperbolic knot
  • Torus knot

References

  1. ^ Colin Adams, The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots, (2001), ISBN 0-7167-4219-5
  2. ^ Menasco, William; Thistlethwaite, Morwen, eds. (2005). Handbook of Knot Theory. Elsevier. ISBN 0080459544. Retrieved 2014-08-18.
  3. ^ Schubert, H. Die eindeutige Zerlegbarkeit eines Knotens in Primknoten. S.-B Heidelberger Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 1949 (1949), 57–104.
  4. ^ Schubert, H. Knoten und Vollringe. Acta Math. 90 (1953), 131–286.
  5. ^ Waldhausen, F. On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large.Ann. of Math. (2) 87 (1968), 56–88.
  6. ^ F.Bonahon, L.Siebenmann, New Geometric Splittings of Classical Knots, and the Classification and Symmetries of Arborescent Knots, [1]
  7. ^ Motegi, K. Knot Types of Satellite Knots and Twisted Knots. Lectures at Knots '96. World Scientific.
  8. ^ Eisenbud, D. Neumann, W. Three-dimensional link theory and invariants of plane curve singularities. Ann. of Math. Stud. 110
  9. ^ Budney, R. JSJ-decompositions of knot and link complements in S^3. L'enseignement Mathematique 2e Serie Tome 52 Fasc. 3–4 (2006). arXiv:math.GT/0506523
  • v
  • t
  • e
Knot theory (knots and links)
Hyperbolic
Satellite
Torus
InvariantsNotation
and operationsOther
  • Category
  • Commons